Governance Stress-Test Simulation
Ecological Disturbance Regimes
Biological Model: Ecological Disturbance Regimes. Many ecosystems stay resilient not by avoiding shocks, but by experiencing manageable disturbances—fires, floods, droughts, storms—that reveal weak points and select for adaptive responses. Systems that never practice disturbance can become brittle: they accumulate hidden vulnerabilities until one shock triggers cascading failure.
This simulation applies that logic to governance and strategy by rehearsing realistic shocks, identifying what breaks first and who is harmed most, and then adding "resilience upgrades" like redundancy, clearer decision rights, faster feedback, loophole closing, and graceful failure modes.
When to Use
- • Designing/revising governance
- • High-stakes strategy decisions
- • Before major launches
- • After a significant failure
Time Required
- • 90 minutes (recommended)
- • 60 min for lightweight pass
- • 120 min for complex coalition
Who Should Participate
- • Decision-makers + implementers
- • At least one "red team" skeptic
- • Facilitator + note-taker
Objectives
- • Identify vulnerabilities
- • Surface equity impacts
- • Strengthen rules & roles
- • Define early-warning triggers
Ready to run a stress-test?
The full simulation takes 90 minutes. You'll be guided through each phase with a timer. Or fill out the canvas at your own pace below.
Session Phases
Step 1: Define What You're Testing
Make the target explicit so the stress test is focused.
Reflection Prompts (after 60-90 days or next real disturbance)
- • Which scenario was most predictive?
- • Where did we still feel brittle?
- • Did our upgrades improve both resilience and legitimacy?
Iteration Options
- • Quarterly: Run a 30-minute "micro stress-test" with one scenario
- • Semi-annually: Run a full stress-test every 6 months
- • Before launches: Run before any major policy or strategy launch
- • Update scenarios: Revise scenarios as the threat landscape changes
Success Signals
After implementing upgrades, look for:
- ✓Clearer roles under stress
- ✓Faster response to early warnings
- ✓Fewer single points of failure
- ✓Reduced harm to vulnerable stakeholders
- ✓Fewer "we didn't see it coming" surprises
